My company is a Poland Spring customer. We receive frequent deliveries of their 5-gallon water bottles for various water coolers stationed around our office.
Last week, I noticed that the bottle had changed. It is now made of a darker blue plastic, and has a slightly different shape. When I looked closer, I saw that the label included a new logo, with the phrase, “ECO SENSE BOTTLE.” There is a trademark symbol after eco-sense, which makes the logo look pretty official. Here’s a picture I took with my phone:
Image of the "ECO SENSE BOTTLE" logo on new 5-gallon Poland Spring bottles.
Given my interest in green marketing and green business issues, I looked closer at the bottle, hoping for an explanation of what eco-sense means. Unfortunately, the only language that could be considered an explanation was, “our eco-sense bottle is returned, refilled and recycled.” As far as I know, the large bottles on water coolers have been getting returned, refilled and recycled for years. In fact, when the Poland Spring delivery team comes to our office, they drop full bottles off and pick up empty bottles to be cleaned and refilled.
Unfortunately, the bottle does not have any more information on what the company, owned by Nestle, means by the new logo. Therefore, I called Poland Spring late last week and connected with someone in their Consumer Affairs department. When they learned that I was calling about a bottle typically delivered to businesses, they connected me to a group that fields questions and comments for their business services group.
I spoke with a very nice representative who explained, “We’re trying to use less plastic on the actual bottles.” She also explained that they are made from “an easier plastic to recycle.” I asked a follow-up question about the ease of recycling the material, but she didn’t have specifics available. I made the suggestion that future bottles include this additional information about containing less plastic and being easier to recycle.
The key lesson from this experience with Poland Spring is one that I and others in the green marketing community have been emphasizing for years: when you make green claims, you must be transparent and provide the details behind the language and numbers. Wherever possible, it helps to provide third-party references for your claims. Poland Spring did not do this, which surprised me, given their past experience: Nestle Waters was hammered with greenwashing claims by bloggers when they came out with their eco-shape bottle across all of their water brands in 2007-2008 (of which Poland Spring is one) – here’s another example of criticism they received. I understand why they have been accused of greenwashing for their retail side bottles, as the majority of plastic bottles end up in landfills, and the eco-shape logo gives people the impression that they are being environmentally-friendly by drinking bottled water. Terrachoice, a leading environmental marketing agency, defines greenwashing as “the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service.” I personally try to drink water out of a reusable bottle whenever possible, and my firm has given them to all of our employees as a way to practice what we preach.
The difference in the case of the eco-sense 5-gallon bottle is that it is not greenwashing, but rather a failure of a major brand to provide clarity on its green claims. Large water coolers enable people to cut down on bottled water consumption in favor of filling up reusable water bottles like those made by Sigg or Nalgene. Poland Spring went to the trouble of trademarking “eco-sense” and creating a special logo for the term, but they didn’t take the extra step of providing consumers an explanation of what the term means. According to Cone, a leading cause marketing agency, 91% of consumers want to hear about companies’ social and environmental commitments. More than the high-level green logo or tagline, conscious consumers want to “get under the hood” and understand the details behind companies’ green claims.
By failing to include further explanation of their eco-sense logo, Poland Spring failed to give their customers the option of learning more. I would strongly suggest they address this lack of transparency, and immediately start adding further information about their eco-sense program onto the larger bottles. It may cost a few more cents per bottle in printing fees, but they will more than make up for it with stronger customer relationships.
Sustainable Ink 
Pingback: Poland Spring's Missed Green Marketing Opportunity: A Discussion … | Breaking News 24/7
Pingback: Internet Marketing Online Advertising - I want article on green marketing in which site can i get?
Yes, that is true, I agree with you, but I am not sure if there are no other options.
Poland Springs is not the only brand to use the ECO SENSE Bottle. It is also on the Deer Park brand
Thanks for the comment. They are all owned by Nestle Waters. I appreciate you reading!
poland spring 5 gallon water bottles are made with #7 polycarbonate plastic which contains bpa
As toni above mentions, #7BPA plastics are bad news. (See Science News: http://bit.ly/akeS2v ) Until we have serious deposits required on plastic and glass containers, the USA will continue to have landfill and litter issues. Having said all that, the move to using less plastic in containers is less expensive for corporations. As long as an economic incentive is there, corporations will herd in that direction. Your request that the “eco” logo come with an explanation is a valid and terrific action; like “organic” logos a few years back, logos like that are worthless without accountability and verification.
The new Poland Spring eco-sense bottles have been changed quietly from polycarbonate to #1 PETE plastic, which is the same as small water bottles. I suspect they are quietly trying to phase out their BPA-leaching polycarbonate bottles without admitting that there’s anything wrong with them, which is why they are not marketing the bottle change in any way and have limited information.
#1 is clearly better than #7 because PC is the absolute worst for BPA, but many people say #1 should only be used once then recycled — Poland Spring is saying they are going to recycle these many times. Still not good.
Better than #7 being used many times though. I’m glad they made the switch. I’ve been trying to steer clear of plastics and recently switched to a stainless steel drinking container. What good does that do if the source of the water comes from a #7 container with all kinds of things leaching into it anyway! At least #1 is a step forward.
One of the many criticisms of 5-gallon jug water cooler offerings has been the composition of the plastic.
A big bottle like this isn’t very durable – and may not be adequately rigid for use – unless it’s polycarbonate. Polycarbonate, (#7 in the little triangle), does indeed rely heavily on BPA, a key hardening agent for many plastics, primarily found in #3 and #7.
BPA is considered an endocrine disruptor – an “artificial hormone” – and has been linked in a number of studies to cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and you name it. It has been banned for use in baby bottles in a number of US states, Canada, and is under intense scrutiny in Europe. The US FDA and EPA have it solidly on their RADAR, and the US Congress has unsuccessfully attempted bill passage to ban it’s use nationally twice now.
BPA has been demonstrated to leach from bottles into water, particularly when hot (a delivery truck, many storage facilities).
Nestle Waters lineup, including Deer Park, Poland Spring, and many others, have switched to “BPA-free” bottles in many cases.
So, the essence of an “Eco-Sense” bottle is that it is now less poisonous to users.
From a landfill perspective, although Nestle claims it’s “easier to recycle”, the softer bottle will now last through fewer refill cycles. Which means more bottles will be disposed of. Since 80% of plastic bottles end up in landfill regardless of their recyclability, we know where these are headed.
BPA is considered an endocrine disruptor – an “artificial hormone” – and has been linked in a number of studies to cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and you name it. It has been banned for use in baby bottles in a number of US states, Canada, and is under intense scrutiny in Europe. The US FDA and EPA have it solidly on their RADAR, and the US Congress has unsuccessfully attempted bill passage to ban it’s use nationally twice now.
BPA has been demonstrated to leach from bottles into water, particularly when hot (a delivery truck, many storage facilities).
Nestle Waters lineup, including Deer Park, Poland Spring, and many others, have switched to “BPA-free” bottles in many cases.
So, the essence of an “Eco-Sense” bottle is that it is now less poisonous to users.
From a landfill perspective, although Nestle claims it’s “easier to recycle”, the softer bottle will now last through fewer refill cycles. Which means more bottles will be disposed of. Since 80% of plastic bottles end up in landfill regardless of their recyclability, we know where these are headed.”
Saul Tarzi, Quench USA
http://www.quenchonline.com
(888) 554-2782 ext. 1410
Pingback: Green Marketing Presentation to Tufts University « Sustainable Ink
Pingback: Green Marketing Lessons for Eco-Entrepreneurs